zirk.us is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Literature, philosophy, film, music, culture, politics, history, architecture: join the circus of the arts and humanities! For readers, writers, academics or anyone wanting to follow the conversation.

Administered by:

Server stats:

760
active users

#conversation

11 posts10 participants1 post today

De l'intérêt des espaces numériques décentralisés (mais interopérationnels) pour la conversation scientifique. Article de 2023 si actuel : "Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge"
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi
La vague d'arrivées sur #Mastodon donne de l'espoir pour une reprise en main de nos capacités d'organiser nos espaces de #conversation (scientifique ou pas).
(Vague certes bien moins forte que celle des arrivées sur Bluesky et Linkedin, centralisés)

Continued thread

The last part of the book Talk: The Science of Conversation and the Art of Being Ourselves discusses conversations between people who may not agree. Other books have tackled this subject at length, so I won’t rehash the ideas here.

While some of the ideas in the book aren’t new (to me), I think they could be applied to collective benefit, both in person and on social media. Less one-upmanship, fewer “gotcha” questions, less correction, less ego. More question asking, more connection, and more kindness, most of all.

🧵 end

I finished the book Talk: The Science of Conversation and the Art of Being Ourselves by Alison Wood Brooks. I love the topic about how to communicate well with other people – it’s an art that we can cultivate to our own and others’ benefit. It’s beautiful, healthy, and connective, and I was happy to have this book become available.

This is a long thread with my notes and direct quotes.

The book begins by identifying maxims that can be used to facilitate conversation, which I think are useful both offline and on: “The TALK maxims break conversation down into four crucial reminders that will guide our entire approach to make conversation more vibrant, enriching, and effective: Topics, because great conversationalists choose good topics and make any topic better; Asking, because asking questions helps us move between topics and dive deeper into them; Levity, to keep our conversations from becoming stale; and Kindness, because great talkers care for others and show it.”

It's an easy reminder – to stay curious, to introduce lightness, and to lead with compassion.

🧵

Continued thread

A quotation from Jane Austen

   Anne smiled and said, “My idea of good company, Mr. Elliot, is a company of clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation; that is what a call good company.”
   “You are mistaken,” said he, gently, “that is not good company; that is the best.”

Jane Austen (1775-1817) English author
Persuasion, ch. 16 (1818)

Sourcing, notes: wist.info/austen-jane/75951/

Spotify for Creators#49 angel near you by Call If You Need Me第49回はゲスト回。Homecomingsの福富優樹さんを迎え楽しくおしゃべりです。花月と愛由の凸凹具合、書くと話すの大きな違い、ホムのニューアルバム、CIYNM ZINE 第二弾つくろう!!などなど。後編もお楽しみに❤︎──0:37 福富ーぬ登場!3:48 ON / OFF 時、出方の違い8:14 バンドで話すときは12:15 見られたい自分とのギャップ19:55 CIYNMは半分ON?24:26 書くことへのハードルとひとり語り28:24 声がもつ情報量の多さ30:30 書くことはセルフケア32:58 ZINE part2 つくりたい!39:22 人生の選択のパターンを変えたい42:00 整理できてない状態をアルバムにした※収録日: 2025年3月21日おたよりや感想、質問はDM•✉️までhomealonediary.jp@gmail.com──𓏸 パーソナリティ惠愛由|Ayu Megumi1996年生まれ、水瓶座。好きな食べ物は水餃子。BROTHER SUN SISTER MOONのベースとボーカルを担当するほか、文筆や翻訳業も。訳書に『99%のためのフェミニズム宣言』(人文書院)など。井上花月|Kazuki Inoue1996年生まれ、双子座。好きな食べ物はビリヤニ。Laura day romanceのボーカル、アートワークを担当。時々モデルや文章を書くことも。#callifyouneedme💌 #homecomings

This #Conversation article is a good ‘opener’ into a Defence/ADF debate that must be had, not just by experts and polies, but by all Australian given it goes to the issue of our collective physical security ( theconversation.com/should-aus ). There is no denying the naiveté in thinking we can ever live our lives peacefully, isolated from the troubles around us. Thinking that we can count on enduring alliances for help when we are threatened is also delusional given history is replete with contradictory tales. So #Defence concerns all of us and is an integral part of politics (I.e. Foreign affairs by other means).

I like the opinion of Jennifer Parker and Peter Layton best of the bunch of opinions expressed by the ‘experts’ because they go to the ‘core’ of what Defence means in practice at the ground level. The process is very simple (the helo view). It is for govt to strategise what must be done to keep Australia as safe as possible and develop any number of Defence policy goals for study by Defence experts. Those Defence experts than come back with Force Plans for each policy goals. After that, it’s up to govt to expand its range of policies to accommodate the defence plans and find the money to fund the most pressing goal achieving preparedness (the more goals can be addressed the more secure Australia will be).

In all cases, ‘preparedness’ is the foundation stone of any defence planning and subsequent actions.

/Arm-Chair General signing off…

The ConversationShould Australia increase its defence spending? We asked 5 experts
More from The Conversation AU + NZ

Reposting this from my back catalogue:

> Trying to understand something isn't validating it.
>
> Understanding something isn't endorsing it.
>
> Explaining something isn't justifying it.
>
> Questioning something isn't attacking it.
>
> Disapproving of something is not approving its opposite.
>
> And agreeing with something isn't blind, unquestioning reverence to it.