zirk.us is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Literature, philosophy, film, music, culture, politics, history, architecture: join the circus of the arts and humanities! For readers, writers, academics or anyone wanting to follow the conversation.

Administered by:

Server stats:

759
active users

#replicability

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

"Estimating the #replicability of Brazilian #biomedical #science"

... Replication rates for these experiments varied between 15 and 45% according to five predefined criteria ...

#Brazil

biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

bioRxiv · Estimating the replicability of Brazilian biomedical scienceConcerns over the replicability and reproducibility of published research have grown in many research fields, but empirical data to inform policies are still scarce. Biomedical research in Brazil expanded rapidly over the last three decades, with no systematic assessment of the replicability of its findings. With this in mind, we set up the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative, a multicenter replication of published experiments from Brazilian science using three common experimental methods: the MTT assay, the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the elevated plus maze (EPM). A total of 56 laboratories performed 143 replications of 56 experiments; of these, 96 replications of 47 experiments were considered valid by an independent committee. Replication rates for these experiments varied between 15 and 45% according to five predefined criteria. In median terms, relative effect sizes were 60% larger in original experiments than in replications, while coefficients of variation were 60% smaller. Effect size decrease was smaller for MTT, cell line experiments and original results with less variability, while t values for replications were positively correlated with researcher predictions about replicability. Deviations from preregistered protocols were very common in replications, most frequently due to reasons inherent to the experimental model or related to infrastructure and logistics. Our results highlight factors that limit the replicability of results published by researchers in Brazil and suggest ways by which this scenario can be improved. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Les interventions de la journée d'étude ARDoISE du 17 décembre sont en ligne et accessibles depuis le site ScienceConf : je2024-ardoise.sciencesconf.or #reproductibilté #replicability #ResearchSoftware Interventions de @zimoun @rougier @NaudetFlorian , Isabelle Blanc administratrice ministérielle des données, code source et logiciels, et d'autres encore...

je2024-ardoise.sciencesconf.orgJournée d'étude Ardoise - 17 décembre 2024 - Sciencesconf.org

Do professors with less PC views self-censor?

Clark et al. reported only the linear relationship: the less PC their view, the more reluctant professors were to share it. Kudos to Clark et al. for publishing their data so Luke could detect a better-fitting non-linear, non-unified explanation: most professors were not self-censoring; they were either uncertain or else unreluctant to share.

doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ab34v

⚙️ Another significant step toward embracing #OpenScience in Ukraine! 🇺🇦

⌛ The Ukrainian Reproducibility Network #UARN is launching during the Ukrainian Open Science Forum on November 21-23, 2024 in Lviv!

As part of the UARN, Local Networks will be established in different regions of Ukraine to support & promote #transparency #reproducibility #replicability practices across all disciplines.

⌛ There’s still a chance to join either in person or online: peers.international/uarn?fbcli
#UOSF2024