zirk.us is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Literature, philosophy, film, music, culture, politics, history, architecture: join the circus of the arts and humanities! For readers, writers, academics or anyone wanting to follow the conversation.

Administered by:

Server stats:

732
active users

#pcengine

2 posts2 participants0 posts today

PC Engine/Turbografx (which supports the base system, CD-ROM² up to Arcade Card, and Supergrafx systems) core has been udpated on MiST and Sidi :ablobcatenjoy:

=== tgfx16_250306.rbf ===

Latest SRG320 commits :

VDC :

- Fix rendering for 7M resolution mode
- Fix timing of sprite evaluation

MiST: github.com/tdelage26/mist-bina

Sidi: github.com/tdelage26/SiDi-FPGA

Continued thread

And what about these?

"Kirby's Adventure" (1993) is unquestionably kid-friendly; "Commander Keen 4" (1991) features an actual kid; "Lemmings" (1991) is so cute; and "Magical Chase" (1991) is the very embodiment of a cute'em-up.

None of these feel childish to me. In the sense of "for kids only, adults need not apply" or "videogames are kids' stuff".

Why is that?

👉 [ more in the alt text ]

I love "Bubble Bobble" (1986) and "Puzzle Bobble" (1994), but "Rainbow Islands" (1987) and "Parasol Stars" (1991) feel a bit childish to me, and I find that interesting...

They all have cartoony graphics – almost the norm before games went all dark and gritty like everything else – and look designed for children at first glance.

So, what's the difference? I'm not really sure.

The enemies in Bubble Bobble have a creepy vibe to them. Maybe that's it?