zirk.us is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Literature, philosophy, film, music, culture, politics, history, architecture: join the circus of the arts and humanities! For readers, writers, academics or anyone wanting to follow the conversation.

Administered by:

Server stats:

735
active users

#tuitionfees

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Dr Keith Wilson 💭<p>UK students shouldn’t see a <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/studentLoan" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>studentLoan</span></a> as a debt, but as a tax: an additional 9% on their earnings above the threshold. Some will pay it off, but many won’t. In which case it will reduce their potential future earnings more or less indefinitely. <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/HigherEducation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HigherEducation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TuitionFees" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TuitionFees</span></a></p>
Adam Jacobs 🇺🇦<p>And just to remind you what Starmer promised when he was standing for Labour leader, he promised to "support the abolition of tuition fees".</p><p>Putting them up is not the same thing as abolition.</p><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/TuitionFees" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TuitionFees</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Starmer" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Starmer</span></a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/BrokenPromises" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>BrokenPromises</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.clpd.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Keir-Starmers-10-Pledges.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">clpd.org.uk/wp-content/uploads</span><span class="invisible">/2020/10/Keir-Starmers-10-Pledges.pdf</span></a></p>
Adam Jacobs 🇺🇦<p>Ah, more "tough decisions" I see, which again are not remotely tough for the rich and powerful.</p><p>Just like all the other "tough decisions".</p><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/TuitionFees" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TuitionFees</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c0qdgndz5wzt" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">bbc.co.uk/news/live/c0qdgndz5w</span><span class="invisible">zt</span></a></p>
Emeritus Prof Christopher May<p>As the <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/LabourParty" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>LabourParty</span></a> starts (ahead of the next election) to rethink its position on <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/tuitionfees" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>tuitionfees</span></a> (having, like the LibDems before them stepped back from a promise to abolition them), here are my thoughts on how we might best understand the discussion of funding students&#39; attendance at <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>university</span></a> (both tuition fees &amp; living costs)</p><p>Key point: its all about who we think captures the benefit(s) of a <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>university</span></a> education!</p><p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@NWBylines" class="u-url mention">@<span>NWBylines</span></a></span> </p><p><a href="https://northwestbylines.co.uk/news/education/who-should-pay-for-students-to-go-to-university/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">northwestbylines.co.uk/news/ed</span><span class="invisible">ucation/who-should-pay-for-students-to-go-to-university/</span></a></p>
Emeritus Prof Christopher May<p>Martin Lewis is still right: <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>university</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/tuitionfees" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>tuitionfees</span></a> are repaid not as a loan but via a shadow <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/graduatetax" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>graduatetax</span></a>... he also makes the central policy point:</p><p>university students&#39; funding is about the balance between social benefits &amp; those captured by individuals;</p><p>recovering the full cost, we&#39;re saying there&#39;s no social benefit; by making it completely free we say the individual gets no advantage(s);</p><p>that&#39;s why I always supported the £3000 fee as a fair sharing of costs!</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/may/13/martin-lewis-graduates-student-loans-finance-graduate-tax" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theguardian.com/money/2023/may</span><span class="invisible">/13/martin-lewis-graduates-student-loans-finance-graduate-tax</span></a></p>
Emeritus Prof Christopher May<p>Here&#39;s Polly Toynbee&#39;s view on where extra money in <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/education" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>education</span></a> should be spent &amp; its not on reducing <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>university</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/tuitionfees" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>tuitionfees</span></a>;</p><p>while I agree with much of her argument about early years education (which definitely needs re-funding), if as she concludes, we want to (also) expand university education, then reforming tuition fees (and overall HE funding) is also necessary.</p><p>In the end; the UK needs a massive rethink of how it delivers &amp; pays for all its levels of education!</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/04/keir-starmer-tuition-fees-education-universities-schools" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theguardian.com/commentisfree/</span><span class="invisible">2023/may/04/keir-starmer-tuition-fees-education-universities-schools</span></a></p>
Emeritus Prof Christopher May<p>Well I suppose at least <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/KeirStarmer" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>KeirStarmer</span></a> has dropped his <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/university" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>university</span></a> <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/tuitionfees" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>tuitionfees</span></a> pledge (to make university free) before any <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/generalelection" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>generalelection</span></a> rather than (like <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/NickClegg" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>NickClegg</span></a>) afterwards.... instead he is promising a &#39;fairer&#39; solution, with details to follow.</p><p>certainly something needs to change, but the Q. is how to shift the cost structure to make it fair(er) without causing further damage to the financial settlement for <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/HigherEducation" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>HigherEducation</span></a> - it won&#39;t be easy</p>