Recent searches
Search options
if you call it lawfare without making a persuasive, affirmative case for why others whose similar behavior came to public and prosecutorial light wouldn't be pursued, then you are just in favor of elite impunity.
@interfluidity This is total BS.
Inn Trumps case, no others were ever prosecuted under the same circumstances.
Even the deluded leftwing (excuse the redundancy) legacy press referred to the "Novel" application of the law.
In the Case of the bulk of J6ers, How many people can you find serving time after a conviction for tresspassing, or being held without bail, as many were?
When green peace, or code pink interruped congress, were they charged? no. even if so, your conclusion is retarded.
@Phil Come on. The classified documents case was a slam dunk, anyone who was asked for return of classified docs and refused and lied about it would be convicted. Yes, others, including Biden, were sloppy, but always cooperated. The Georgia case was also a slam dunk, literally asking a governor to find votes. It's hard to find comparables because no one has been so brazen. Some of the J6ers may have been overprosecuted, but the violent ones certainly were not.
@interfluidity
You are probably one of the most credulous people I have ever encountered.
Even the Dems I know question these things, but you drink the kool aid down to the last drop and lick the cup.
@Phil We can agree on the claim, "You are probably one of the most credulous people I have ever encountered." But we probably disagree on the referents.